Reasoning behind the use of word Pyramid
I am not going to discuss the origin of word PYRAMID or how Egyptian pyramids got their name. I am sure you all know that very well. However, I would like to give you the reasoning behind using the word pyramid as it applies to Pyramid Investing.
Let me start with mentioning that “pyramid” would not be the only name that would fit the idea of Pyramid Investing. At least several other names could be as successfully used to describe this same concept. However, one of the most prominent characteristics of Pyramid Investing is increase in additional investment amount as the price of selected investment instrument goes down. If one would graphically represent these additional investment amounts or “buys” and stack them up on top of each other, a fair resemblance to a pyramid would be achieved. Thus, there is a graphical or geometrical reason to why word pyramid has been chosen.
Pyramid is also a great word that probably associates many with beauty, stability and longevity of Egyptian pyramids. It carries a strong symbolism to monumental achievements of early civilizations. In a sense, Pyramid Investing is your pyramid in investment world. It gives your portfolio stability, longevity to your financial life and provides you with monumental achievement in terms of consistently booked profits. Thus, there is also figurative or symbolic reason to select the word pyramid for such an amazing concept.
Geometry play and obtaining basic Pyramid Investing shape
So let’s start from the beginning. Let’s look at an ordinary example of pyramid (Fig.1). You can see, as it is also well defined in geometry, that pyramid is a 3-dimensional shape. We usually think of pyramid that has square base, although that is only a special case of pyramid. For Pyramid Investing purposes, only two dimensions are necessary. To be more precise in geometrical terms, Pyramid Investing could be called “Triangle Investing” or “Isosceles Trapezoid Investing” (since we tend to deal with clipped pyramids). Although these 2-dimensional shapes describe better the shape we want to use, their names are quite cumbersome and for the reasons of simplicity and easier association, we want to stick with the term “pyramid”.
Now let’s perform a little geometry play and morph our pyramid into a shape that fits the best the needs of Pyramid Investing. First, we can rid of 3rd dimension by taking into account only cross section of a pyramid. Starting from a regular, symmetrical pyramid and using perpendicular cross-sectional plane, the 2-dimensional shape obtained is a simple triangle (Fig.2). It is not necessarily equilateral triangle, but it is certainly isosceles triangle that has two sides equal in length.
I have mentioned before that Pyramid Investing concept is about price diversification. It basically operates by employing multitude of price levels to help determine when to buy or sell. So let’s represent different price levels by adding thin horizontal lines inside our triangle (Fig.3.). These price levels will make more sense later as we progress towards final Pyramid Investing shape and definition of Pyramid Investing terminology.
The next thing we can do is clip the top of our triangle! We can clip it in such a way that we obtain a different shape that has its top and bottom sides parallel. This shape is called trapezoid (Fig.4), or isosceles trapezoid to be more precise. We will also see later why we want to have a shape that has a flat top instead of a vertex of a triangle.
Our trapezoid has straight left and right sides. But that doesn’t intersect well with price levels we have added. One thing we can do to improve it, is to make those sides as stairs (Fig.5.)! Now, this is much better for our purpose. We can imagine this shape being built from number of rectangles, stacked up on top of each other. Wider rectangles are laid down towards the bottom and narrower ones towards the top. So we have rectangles that are used as building bricks for this pyramidal shape and those rectangles have different widths. What is the meaning of width? What does it symbolize?
So far I mentioned price levels. For each price level, we basically have a rectangle with a certain width. Widths are also increasingly ordered from top to the bottom. I also mentioned earlier that the point of this geometrical exercise is to obtain a shape that will help us determine at what price to buy or sell. But do we know how much to buy or sell? That is exactly the answer – rectangle width represents the amount of the trade.
So we have obtained this interesting shape that is built from number of blocks and really reminds us of pyramids. And talking about pyramid resemblance, how about the resemblance with the Pyramids of Guimar? Click here to see the photo.
Now, let’s abandon the pyramid resemblance and focus on our rectangular building blocks. Let’s stack them up in such a way that they all got “collated”. In other words, let’s pull them together so they all start from the same line (Fig.6). I am not sure what the name of this shape would be, but that is exactly what we wanted to create in order to be able to define the terminology used in Pyramid Investing.
In the following articles, we will look closer at the width and height of rectangular blocks. We will also look at other measurements of this Pyramid Investing shape. We will give names to all of those and we will stick to that terminology later when we get to analyze and apply different “pyramids”.
Alternative shapes
The shape we obtained here will help us define basic Pyramid Investing terminology. We will use this shape most of the time. There are also some alternative shapes that will help us achieve certain modifications in our investing approach. However, any other shape we get to use will be composed similarly and the same basic terminology will be used to describe it.
Alternative shapes may be quite complex and actually not even obtainable as a cross section of any pyramid. Therefore, the term pyramid is used loosely for those shapes. In those cases, the purpose of term pyramid is to symbolize the concept rather then to reflect the precise mathematical description of a shape in use.
Note for non-geometry inclined investors
I tried to use simple geometry to introduce the shape that will help us define Pyramid Investing terminology. If you never liked geometry when you were in school, you may not find this approach appealing. However, even without understanding all the geometrical terms in this article, the Pyramid Investing concept can still be successfully applied. You can come back to this article later and use it as a reference after you’ve already figured out the terminology we use. At that time, everything explained here will seem pretty easy and self-explanatory.











This is exciting stuff. I’m eager to see future articles on how you work out exactly how much to buy and sell. The pyramid tells you how much to buy. How do you know at which prices and how much to sell?
Actually, the very same pyramid is used for both buying and selling. Pyramid investor needs to spend some time to “shape” the appropriate pyramid prior to investing the first dollar. That process is not unique, there is no universally best pyramid and there is fair amount of freedom involved.
Once settled on a particular pyramid, the investing process becomes simple routine of buying and selling (booking profits). The beauty of the concept is that after deciding on a pyramid, the investor does not need to make not a single decision any more! I.e. no more which price, how much…
Hi Sasa,
Your explanation on the pyramid-nature of the buys and sells is quite well presented. Also, you presented the fact that the exact shape of the buy and sell sizes can be chosen. …a point I have made a primary issue in the Vortex Investment Method. . .an upside down Vortex also looks more or less like a Pyramid, so our systems are rather similar! The name Vortex Investing and Turbovest Investing are named with a different idea in mind than addressing the step sizes structure:
A vortex (in fluid dynamics) creates a “sucking action”. . .it sucks up the loose money from investors that Buy High (greed driven) and Sell Low (fear driven).
The Turbo is like a very strong vortex. . a tornado! Turbovest does the same thing as the program Vortex. . only much more aggressively!
A suggestion for you Pyramid Shapes
Some investors may be interested more in equity growth rather than direct profit creaming:
1) You could increase the strength of the buying steps and weaken the selling steps. The investor would systematically add extra money to his portfolio as prices dip down. This is the Portfolio Growth Mode;
2) For investors that have a healthy portfolio already and want to liquidate their investment as they are retiring the selling steps can be increased and the buying steps be decreased, but if prices periodically drop deep the buying action could “kick in” strongly and they would buy extra equity at opportunity price that in the turnaround of the price dip throws off the extra profit as cash. This is a Portfolio Liquidation Mode
In my Vortex System such “pyramid step sizes” can easily be chosen by the investor using simple buy-aggression factors and sell-aggression factors. . .as they see fit. In effect this would mean that the Pyramids Shapes you explained are in the Vortex System rather flexible. The down side of this is that this flexibility. . .if used. . . makes optimizing the system more complex, so the users have to choose between simplicity and complexity, all depending on how much time they want to spend on “sucking” more or less money out of the market.
Conrad,
I like your suggestions. I see you gave a great amount of thought to allow for different modes for different types of investors.
As a matter of fact, I do apply your suggestion #1 in my account. In my case I refer to it as building CORE position. I achieve that by superimposing trading and core pyramids that have different parameters. Thus they overlap when it comes to buying. On the sell side, only trading pyramid gets sold since core pyramid is to be sold at much higher prices (or even at prices that have not been defined yet).
I think having core (or growth as you put it) is extremely important in wealth building process, especially in bull markets (think Gold). Trading pyramid captures volatility and creates more ounces, while core pyramid acquires ounces on weakness and captures the uptrend. There is also certain advantage of having separate pyramids for trading and core since one can have them in separate accounts. Core pyramid would be much “slower” in action and core account does not need to be monitored on a frequent basis. That approach has certain merits in controlling one’s emotions. Investor is not temped to sell the core in fear or greed if they don’t look at the account on a daily basis.
I think your suggestion #2 is very appropriate. The biggest money is made out of the hole! Ability to vary the step size is very useful. I think Average True Range (ATR) can be utilized here to tweak trading based on recent amount of volatility in the market. When ATR drops, step size can be reduced to “suck” more profits from a given lower volatility conditions. It holds the other way round too. Downside is that investor needs to make another decision about the step size. I don’t mind doing that but some investors may prefer not fiddling much with the process once they initiate it. Of course, you leave up to the investor to adjust things or not. Even if they dislike tweaking various factors, at least you gave them an option.
I find what may not be enough options for me is more than some other people can handle. So again, you have the basic concept that works and who wants more control or options has to put up with increased complexity. I think that is perfectly fine although there is probably some fine line where increase in complexity does not produce more profits (law of diminishing returns).